March marked the historical signing of a bill ending a century-long initiative
to reform health care and end corruption in insurance agencies.
The bill extends coverage to 32 million uninsured Americans
nationwide by 2014.
While referring to the Health Care Bill, Obama pointed out that the program
“won’t fix every problem in our health care system in one fell swoop,” but,
he said it is a “major step forward toward giving Americans with insurance
and those without a sense of security when it comes to their health.”
Thirty percent of young adults ages 19 to 29 are uninsured and the new bill
will impact them immediately.
Adult children 26 and under are now eligible to stay on their parent’s insurance
policy. If students opt out of this option, then traditional health care will
cost less than that of middle-aged adults.
Josiah Cantrell, 20-year-old SCC student, says that although the bill will benefi
t him, he is concerned that it has upset the balance of power in government.
“I do not understand how the federal government is able to mandate that over
private insurance companies. As I understand, that is not in the Constitution
as a power they can hold,” Cantrell said.
Under the bill, traditional health insurance packages may cost more than
what students are currently paying, but they will be required to buy them unless
they qualify for an exemption.
Citizens who reject the mandate to obtain health insurance could face
fi nes beginning in 2014 of $95, or 1 percent of income. In the following years,
the fi ne will rise sharply to $695, or 2 percent of income. College students and
those under the age of 18 will be required to pay half this amount.
In a state of conflict
Arizona legislature approved a budget in March with an $8.9 billion spending
plan that will eliminate a health care program that used to cover $47,000
low-income children and $310,000 adults. This plan is in direct conflict with
Obama’s health care plan.
John Kavanagh, state legislator and SCC criminal justice studies professor,
said, “We have authorized the governor to join a lawsuit with other states challenging
the mandate to cover those people,” adding, “If that fails and it comes
down to reestablish coverage or lose all Medicaid benefi ts, we will reestablish
coverage.”
Gov. Jan Brewer signed a bill April 1 that allows her to disregard the refusal
of Arizona’s attorney general, Terry Goddard, to join the growing lawsuit.
There are 14 other states involved in the lawsuit.
“If we have to restore (coverage) it will cost the state about three quarters
of a billion dollars per year and that means the reductions the sales tax increase
was supposed to prevent will occur anyway. If the sales tax fails, there
will be deeper budget cuts than anyone could have imagined,” Kavanagh said.
These cuts will be spread across education, public safety and state parks,
Kavanagh said.
Opposing viewpoints
Dr. Elisa Faybush, MD, is a gastroenterologist in Phoenix and is originally
from Canada. She says the fact that people have to pay out-of-pocket to seek
her services makes her uncomfortable.
Faybush is understanding of the fact that the new health care changes may
cut her salary, but says she hopes that she can offset her fi nancial losses by the
volume of patients that will now be able to afford her services.
“I hope to see more people. I hope people get help when they need it, not
when they can afford it,” Faybush said.
People who cannot afford health care ultimately end up in the hospital,
Faybush said. Patients run up bills for tests and procedures and taxpayers are
left to pay the costs. “In the end, when someone can’t afford health care at the
present time, we all pay for it.”
Faybush’s colleagues have contrasting opinions. “They are very afraid of
anything that has to do with socialized medicine. They fear their income is
going to get dramatically reduced and they will be working harder for less
money,” Faybush said.
Not all doctors have such a positive outlook about the bill. Dr. Mitch Wagner,
MD, says that the government should not be offering citizens health
insurance other than Medicare. “The Medicare system itself is fraught with
problems so nothing is going to be solved by expanding their (government’s)
role in the health care system,” he said, also noting that he has met very few
doctors in support of the bill.
Wagner said he expects health care to split into two sectors: one with the
government provided care and the second, a private market.
According to Wagner, the amount of time it takes to actually see a doctor
will increase and the quality of care will decrease. “The patients might get
taken care of, but it might not be the quality of care they are used to being
delivered at this time,” he said.
Student loans revamped
Almost lost in the controversy surrounding the Health Care Bill was the
signing of a smaller piece of legislature that overhauls the student loan industry.
President Obama called the bill, “One of the most signifi cant investments in
higher education since the G.I. Bill.”



Be the first to comment on this article! Log in to Comment
You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now